Multiple choiceQuestion 1 · Recall
Loading…
By the end you can state which neutrino is emitted in beta-minus decay and which in beta-plus decay, write both decay equations completely, and give the charge and mass of a neutrino.
Beta decay does not emit a beta particle on its own. Each decay also emits a neutrino or an antineutrino:
The complete equations are
or, in nuclide notation, for example
| property | electron neutrino | electron antineutrino |
|---|---|---|
| charge | 0 | 0 |
| mass | approximately 0 (far less than an electron) | approximately 0 |
| nucleon number | 0 | 0 |
| emitted in | beta-plus decay | beta-minus decay |
Because it has no charge and essentially no mass, a neutrino barely interacts with matter: it can pass through the Earth without being stopped. That is why it went undetected for decades after its existence was predicted.
Nucleon number conservation is unaffected by the neutrino, since its is 0. Its zero charge means your charge balance is also unaffected. It shows up in the equation because energy and momentum must balance.
Consider a single nucleus decaying at rest. Before the decay the total momentum is zero, so after the decay the beta particle and the daughter nucleus must move in opposite directions with equal and opposite momenta.
If only those two particles existed, their kinetic energies would be fixed by momentum conservation — the same way an alpha decay gives one definite alpha energy. But beta particles are measured with a continuous spread of energies, right down to zero. The missing energy has to go somewhere, and the only explanation is a second, unseen particle leaving with it: the (anti)neutrino.
That is how Pauli predicted the neutrino in 1930, twenty-six years before it was detected.